Features for Evaluation on K.M.E.

Home > Evaluation and Accreditation on K.M.E.  > Features for Evaluation on K.M.E.

Features of 1st and 2nd cycle system

section the 1st cycle(2010-2016) the 2nd cycle(2017-)
Main goal Understand of evaluation and accreditation and frame governance of KM education Convert to outcome and capability based KM education program
domain 6 domains: vision and developing plan of univ., member of univ., education, facilities, finance and management, community service 5 domains: operating system, education, professor, student, facilities and utilities
item 72items(58 compulsory(required) items/ 38 excellent items) 24items(80 evaluation factors)
evaluation method required criteria: minimum and unconditional requirement every univ. must get achieved

excellent criteria: standards for pursuing global competence and advancement of univ.
Paragon: fulfill every item suggested by evaluation and accreditation criteria/ present an exemplary case to other univ.

Eligibility: fulfill every item suggested by evaluation and accreditation criteria/ present specific grounds

Supplementation: insufficient in some items suggested by evaluation and accreditation criteria and need to be complemented/ have potential to improve in short period

Nonstandard(Substandard): hard to confirm grounds related to evaluation and accreditation results/ action plans for improvement of quality are not arranged