Evaluation and Accreditation on K.M.E.
Features for Evaluation on K.M.E.
Home > Evaluation and Accreditation on K.M.E. > Features for Evaluation on K.M.E.
Features of 1st and 2nd cycle system
section | the 1st cycle(2010-2016) | the 2nd cycle(2017-) |
---|---|---|
Main goal | Understand of evaluation and accreditation and frame governance of KM education | Convert to outcome and capability based KM education program |
domain | 6 domains: vision and developing plan of univ., member of univ., education, facilities, finance and management, community service | 5 domains: operating system, education, professor, student, facilities and utilities |
item | 72items(58 compulsory(required) items/ 38 excellent items) | 24items(80 evaluation factors) |
evaluation method | required criteria: minimum and unconditional requirement every univ. must get achieved excellent criteria: standards for pursuing global competence and advancement of univ. |
Paragon: fulfill every item suggested by evaluation and accreditation criteria/ present an exemplary case to other univ. Eligibility: fulfill every item suggested by evaluation and accreditation criteria/ present specific grounds Supplementation: insufficient in some items suggested by evaluation and accreditation criteria and need to be complemented/ have potential to improve in short period Nonstandard(Substandard): hard to confirm grounds related to evaluation and accreditation results/ action plans for improvement of quality are not arranged |